Monday, November 21, 2011

Gingrich calls for private retirement accounts

Republican presidential candidate, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich leaves after speaking at a town meeting at St. Anselm College in Manchester, N.H., Monday, Nov. 21, 2011. (AP Photo/Cheryl Senter)

Republican presidential candidate, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich leaves after speaking at a town meeting at St. Anselm College in Manchester, N.H., Monday, Nov. 21, 2011. (AP Photo/Cheryl Senter)

Republican presidential candidate, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, speaks at a town meeting at St. Anselm College in Manchester, N.H., Monday, Nov. 21, 2011. (AP Photo/Cheryl Senter)

Republican presidential candidate, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, speaks at a town meeting at St. Anselm College in Manchester, N.H., Monday, Nov. 21, 2011. (AP Photo/Cheryl Senter)

(AP) ? Republican presidential contender Newt Gingrich on Monday proposed allowing younger workers still decades away from retirement to bypass Social Security and instead choose private investment accounts that would be subject to stock market gyrations.

The former House speaker, who has risen in the polls, would allow younger workers to take their share of the payroll tax that funds Social Security and put it in a private account.

Employers would still pay their share of the tax, which would be used to pay benefits for current retirees. But it would create a funding shortfall that Gingrich brushed off.

"That gap is more than covered by the savings" that would come from giving states control of 185 social welfare programs, Gingrich told reporters after a speech that laid out broad concepts but lacked key details.

Gingrich's plan would cover the near-term deficits by giving to states responsibility for such programs as AmeriCorps volunteers, Section 8 public housing and Pell Grants for college students. He said states were better suited to administer those programs.

Gingrich said his retirement proposal, an idea floated by Republicans before him, would empower voters.

"Wouldn't you rather control your account?" Gingrich asked an audience of students at St. Anselm College.

His advisers couldn't say how much the plan would cost, when it would begin or who would be eligible. They did say, however, that current retirees would continue to receive benefits at promised levels.

Peter Ferrara, Gingrich's senior economic policy adviser, said federal spending as a whole would be reduced by half within the next three decades.

"It's a lot of reduction," he said.

At a business leaders' breakfast earlier in the day in Nashua, Gingrich predicted that the program "would save literally trillions over the next generation."

Under the plan, workers would be able to do one of two things: continue sending their share of Social Security taxes to the popular, safety-net program or give it to private firms that would compete for those dollars ? as much as $20,000 a year, Gingrich estimated.

"No one is ever forced into the (private account) system," he said after the speech.

Markets would determine how much money workers who chose private accounts would get each month. Gingrich guaranteed a minimum income in case Wall Street collapses like it did in 2008.

As Gingrich spoke Monday, stocks plunged several hundred points by midday as a special congressional panel in Washington appeared ready to declare failure in its attempt to agree on how to trim federal spending by $1.2 trillion over a decade.

Under Gingrich's plan, the federal government would regulate the private accounts run by private firms to ensure the portfolios were diversified enough to prevent one company or sector from taking down the entire system.

Government approved firms then would compete for consumers, who could move their money among accounts based on fund performance.

Organized labor and advocacy groups such as AARP would be allowed to collaborate with the investment firms to tailor plans to reflect the promises they make in pension plans.

Gingrich's plan also would treat the private retirement accounts as other investments, which could be passed on as part of an estate.

President George W. Bush offered some similar proposals for Social Security after he was re-elected in 2004, but faced stiff resistance from Democrats and some within his own party about any proposed changes to the popular program.

Workers pay a 6.2 percent Social Security tax on the first $106,800 in wages, which is matched by employers. This year, the tax rate for workers was reduced temporarily to 4.2 percent. The tax cut is set to expire at the end of the year, though President Barack Obama wants to expand it and extend it for another year. Congress is expected to approve.

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/3d281c11a96b4ad082fe88aa0db04305/Article_2011-11-21-US-Gingrich-Entitlements/id-e20fc53f96534bc0ae9c38f28e16b7ea

uc berkeley ohio state basketball annie annie zuccotti park leymah gbowee will rogers

The Union Minister for Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation and Culture, Kum. Selja addressing at the inauguration of ?The embodied Image Krishna Reddy ? A Retrospective?, in New Delhi on November 19, 2011.

Sorry, Readability was unable to parse this page for content.

Source: http://pib.nic.in/release/phsmall.asp?phid=37714

rock hill sc kate middleton pregnant national book awards jessica sutta houston astros matt barnes sexiest man alive 2011

Unhealthy Credit score Automotive Loans And Complete Answer

? November 21, 2011Posted in: News

A bad credit score automobile loans are for people in search of an automobile loan and having adverse credit record. Are you suffering from weak credit problems? Low credit score is more commonplace now-a-days. It isn?t as a lot bad because it sounds. With some efforts, you can without a doubt beef up your credit score. Horrible credit automobile loans are designed in particular for such people.

Unfavorable credit ratings car loans give you a possibility to improve your credit score ratings. Do not go for automobile loans which are past your budget. One of these state of affairs might again aggravate your credit record.

To obtain unfavorable credit ratings car loans, you want to have a gentle income source to repay your loan including the passion part. A gentle source of revenue supply or a task may help you get the adverse credit automotive loans. Lenders take a look at your current activity or the source of revenue source, your credit score ratings and on that foundation approve low credit score automotive loans.

Huge down bills may even will let you in financing your dream automobile with a horrible credit record. Down payment will depend on the automobile fashions you have got decided on to buy.

Spotty credit report will no doubt impact your application for low credit automotive loans,. But you?ll be able to nonetheless look for other options. A large number of creditors within the financial market can negotiate for the auto finance and the mortgage deals. Creditors are providing aggressive deals for patrons in search of horrible credit automobile loans.

Carry home the up to date fashion dream automotive and make lifestyles extra pleased with unfavorable credit ratings automobile loans.

Emergencies come with out knocking your door and you can not wait to fulfil your emergencies till subsequent pay cheque to be cleared. Infrequently our loved ones or close to ones are unable to lend us the extra quantity and the placement aggravate if one is affected by a bad credit score historical past, however don?t be discouraged, as a substitute go for poor credit payday loans. Horrible credit payday loans cater in particular to the desires of unfavorable credit ratings borrowers.

Low credit score payday loan: common data

The loans are given at the basis of judgment of your repayment capability. This makes lender confide in you with money. And on the subject of below-average credit payday loans, it becomes all the extra crucial. Those are quick time period loans planned to mass the distance amid any of your financial requirement and a ways fetch pay day. As payday loans don?t calls for any credit score take a look at lender imposes higher interest rate.

If you would like further info about high risk loans, swing by Esta B Dongo?s website without hesitation.

Related posts:

  1. If You Have A Poor Credit Rating Then Poor Credit Car Loans Could Be Your Only Option
  2. Fixing Your Credit score Rating
  3. Bad Credit Loans For You
  4. Payday Loans: A Smart Way To Solve Financial Emergencies
  5. The Issues You Can Do To Restore Unhealthy Credit

About GregorioHermosura769

Source: http://www.emmiemagazine.com/unhealthy-credit-score-automotive-loans-complete-answer.html

ben folds apple announcement sprint iphone sprint iphone defamation solyndra tesla model s

How Russia's Martian moon probe got stuck orbiting Earth

Launched Tuesday, Russia's Phobos-Grunt spacecraft was meant to explore the Martian moon Phobos. But, in what could mark the fourth Mars probe failure in a row, Phobos-Grunt now threatens to become another piece of space junk uselessly orbiting Earth.?

A robotic Russian spacecraft that launched on a mission to the Mars moon Phobos Tuesday (Nov. 8) is apparently stuck in Earth orbit, but hope for the probe is not lost yet, according to news reports.

Skip to next paragraph

The?Phobos-Grunt spacecraft launched?at 3:16 p.m. EST (2016 GMT) Tuesday and was supposed to be on its way to Phobos by now. The probe separated from its Zenit rocket properly, but its own thrusters then failed to fire in order to send the spacecraft streaking toward Mars, Russian officials said.

"It has been a tough night for us because we could not detect the spacecraft [after the separation]," Russian space agency chief Vladimir Popovkin said, Russian news agency?RIA Novosti reported. "Now we know its coordinates and we found out that the [probe's] engine failed to start."

Popovkin added that engineers aren't yet sure why Phobos-Grunt's engine didn't ignite, according to RIA Novosti. It's possible the onboard computers didn't send the proper command, he said.

Whatever the cause, the malfunction dealt a serious blow to the?$163 million Phobos-Grunt mission, which aims to grab bits of Phobos' surface and send them back to Earth by 2014. But there may still be hope for the spacecraft, Russia's first attempt at an interplanetary mission since 1996.

"We will attempt to reboot the program," RIA Novosti reported Popovkin as saying. "The spacecraft is currently on a support orbit, the fuel tanks have not been jettisoned, and the fuel has not been spent."

Engineers have about three days to figure out and fix the problem, Popovkin added. After that time, Phobos-Grunt's batteries will run out, and the spacecraft will likely turn into just another piece of space debris. [Photos: Russia's Phobos-Grunt Mission to Mars Moon]

Phobos-Grunt is also carrying China's first Mars probe, a small spacecraft called Yinghuo 1, that is supposed to separate from Phobos-Grunt and enter orbit around Mars.

If Phobos-Grunt cannot be salvaged, it would mark the fourth straight Mars failure for Russia.

The nation's Phobos 1 and Phobos 2 spacecraft, which launched in July 1988, suffered critical failures before their missions were complete. And the Mars 96 probe crashed into the Pacific Ocean shortly after liftoff in November 1996.

Russia is not alone in suffering setbacks with Mars missions. Historically, about half of all missions aimed at the Red Planet have failed, according to NASA records.

NASA also currently plans to launch a new U.S. mission to Mars this month. The $2.5 billion Mars Science Laboratory mission will send a car-size rover called Curiosity to explore the huge Gale crater on Mars.

Several spacecraft are actively studying Mars today. They include orbiting spacecraft operated by NASA and the European Space Agency, as well as NASA's Opportunity rover on the planet's surface.

You can follow SPACE.com senior writer Mike Wall on Twitter:?@michaeldwall. Follow SPACE.com for the latest in space science and exploration news on Twitter?@Spacedotcom?and on?Facebook.

Source: http://rss.csmonitor.com/~r/feeds/science/~3/VR-u-WRCoK4/How-Russia-s-Martian-moon-probe-got-stuck-orbiting-Earth

coco rocha coco rocha al sharpton izon heart attack grill gaddafi dead steve wynn

Sunday, November 20, 2011

Correction: Reds Opening Day story (AP)

CINCINNATI ? In a Nov. 15 story about the rescheduling of the Cincinnati Reds' season-opening baseball game from Good Friday, The Associated Press incorrectly identified Roman Catholic services held that day as Mass. Catholic churches hold services on Good Friday but do not celebrate Mass.

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/sports/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20111118/ap_on_sp_ba_ne/bbn_reds_opening_day

loretta lynn extract extract bobby jindal bobby jindal talladega broncos

John W. Whitehead: Cancer-Causing Airport Scanners? Enough Is ...

Just when you started to think it might be safe to fly again...

Remember those whole-body, X-ray scanners the government installed in airports across the country and kept insisting were so safe? It turns out that they're not so safe, after all. According to an investigative report by "ProPublica/PBS NewsHour," anywhere from six to 100 U.S. airline passengers each year could get cancer from the machines.

Many Americans initially objected to the invasive nature of the scans, which have been likened to "virtual strip searches" because of the degree to which intimate details of the body are revealed. In response, the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) attempted to alter the devices to make the X-ray images less graphic. Unfortunately, the TSA has done little to nothing about the concerns increasingly being raised about the risk of cancer from the scanners.

Yet as far back as 1998, radiation experts were warning against using X-ray scanners to peer beneath people's clothing in the search for weapons and contraband, insisting that the machines violate a longstanding principle in radiation safety -- that humans shouldn't be X-rayed unless there is a medical benefit. More recently, in April 2010, four members of the University of California faculty relayed to Dr. John P. Holdren, President Obama's Science and Technology czar, their concerns about the serious health risks posed to travelers by the whole body backscatter X-ray scanners, which concentrate radiation on the skin. Refuting the TSA's insistence that the scanners are safe, the scientists believe that the scanners could cause mutations and skin cancer. Other scientists have also voiced their concerns over the devices, such as Dr. David Brenner, who heads Columbia University's Center for Radiological Research. He states that radiation produced by the scanners is 20 times higher than the official estimate.

Incredibly, the government has continued to dismiss the medical and scientific community's concerns about these X-ray machines, relying instead on safety assurances from profit-driven corporations such as Rapiscan. As a result, notes investigative reporter Michael Grabell, "the United States has begun marching millions of airline passengers through the X-ray body scanners, parting ways with countries in Europe and elsewhere that have concluded that such widespread use of even low-level radiation poses an unacceptable health risk. The government is rolling out the X-ray scanners despite having a safer alternative that the Transportation Security Administration says is also highly effective." (Grabell is referring to millimeter-wave scanners, which rely on low-energy radio waves and perform the exact same function as X-ray scanners without the potential harm to health.)

The "ProPublica/PBS NewsHour" report, which is available here, traces the history of the scanners, details exactly how the decision to deploy these scanners came about, and documents the gaps in regulation that allowed them to avoid rigorous safety evaluation. This report is a damning indictment of the extent to which the American people have been sold to the highest corporate bidder by government leaders.

As Grabell points out, even the TSA's argument that the scanners are essential to preventing attacks on airplanes starts to fall apart once you realize that they waited nine years after 9/11 to start deploying them, and only after being lobbied heavily by Rapiscan, which wanted to get their machines in airports throughout the country. Their lobbying paid off to the tune of $300 million in revenue in 2011: While there are other manufacturers of these machines, Rapiscan is the only one supplying them to American airports.

Currently, there are roughly 250 X-ray scanners and 264 millimeter-wave scanners in U.S. airports, largely funded by Obama's stimulus plan. By the end of 2012, the TSA intends to have 1,275 backscatter and millimeter-wave scanners covering more than half its security lanes, with 1,800 covering nearly all the lanes by 2014. As Grabell reports, "The TSA has designated the scanners for 'primary' screening: Officers will direct every passenger, including children, to go through either a metal detector or a body scanner, and the passenger's only alternative will be to request a physical pat-down."

Of course, the retributive, harsh treatment and excessive full-body searches being meted out to those who decline a full-body scan may not be a very comforting alternative to the TSA's virtual strip searches. While having a full-body frisk may not pose any direct health risks, it has becoming increasingly apparent that TSA agents carry out the physical searches in so invasive and humiliating a manner as to discourage travelers from opting out of the scans.

It's bad enough having to shell out exorbitant amounts of money in order to travel, but there's no reason any individual should be forced to choose between a certified health risk or a humiliating, invasive search of their person by ill-trained government agents.

To say that "we the people" have done a sorry job of holding our representatives accountable or standing up for our rights is putting it mildly, but there must be a limit to our temerity. At a minimum, the X-ray scanners need to be replaced with radio-frequency millimeter-wave scanners, which, unlike their counterparts, have not been shown to cause cancer in humans. And the DHS and TSA need to go back to the drawing board and find a better way to protect national security without sacrificing our health and our freedoms.

We've suffered countless abuses since 9/11. In the name of national security, we've been subjected to government agents wiretapping our phones, reading our mail, monitoring our emails and carrying out warrantless "black bag" searches of our homes. Then we had to deal with surveillance cameras mounted on street corners and in traffic lights, weather satellites co-opted for use as spy cameras from space, and thermal sensory imaging devices that can detect heat and movement through walls. Now we find ourselves subjected to cancer-causing full-body scanners in airports, and all the government can say is that it's "a really, really small amount relative to the security benefit you're going to get."

What will it take for Americans to finally say enough is enough?

A longer version of this commentary can be found here.

?

?

?

Follow John W. Whitehead on Twitter: www.twitter.com/rutherford_inst

Source: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/john-w-whitehead/cancer-airport-scanners_b_1079495.html

beef wellington ronnie brown man up man up wayne newton naomi wolf ron paul 2012

Site reveals if you'd survive a nuclear bomb

WouldISurviveANuke.com

By Rosa Golijan

What would happen if your area was under a nuclear attack? Would you survive, suffer injuries, or be doomed? There's a site which can provide an answer.

The site is appropriately named?WouldISurviveANuke.com?and it?will tell you your odds by doing some mysterious calculations and slapping markings onto a Google Map.

All you have to do is select how aggressive an attack should be, how many cities are to be targeted, which type of bomb should be used, and enter your location. Boom! You'll know if you'd theoretically survive.

Keep in mind that WouldISurviveANuke.com is intended for entertainment purposes. You shouldn't exactly use it to plan out your escape routes in case your location ever did turn into a target for a nuclear bomb.

Related stories:

Want more tech news, silly puns or amusing links? You'll get plenty of all three if you keep up with Rosa Golijan, the writer of this post, by following her on?Twitter, subscribing to her?Facebook?posts, or circling her?on?Google+.

Source: http://digitallife.today.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2011/11/17/8860011-site-reveals-if-youd-survive-a-nuclear-bomb

chris morris mike stoops mike stoops end of the world end of the world jerome harrison ryan leaf